Security & Compliance Documentation

Security & ComplianceArchitecture

Enterprise-grade security built for institutional finance. CampusChain Intelligence is designed from the ground up to meet the security, privacy, and regulatory requirements of university treasury, compliance, and IT security teams.

Transparency Notice — SOC 2 Status

CampusChain Intelligence has not yet completed a SOC 2 Type II audit. A SOC 2 audit is on our security roadmap and is a planned milestone. We are documenting our security controls, access management, and incident response procedures in preparation for a formal audit engagement. This page accurately reflects our current architecture and our compliance roadmap — we do not claim certifications we have not earned.

Demo Mode — synthetic data for illustration
CampusChain Intelligence Compliance Monitoring dashboard showing OFAC sanctions screening results with ML confidence scores for university treasury counterparties.

CampusChain Intelligence Compliance Monitoring: live OFAC sanctions screening with ML confidence scoring, flagged wallet addresses, entity-level results, and scheduled report delivery — all immutably logged on-chain.

Compliance Posture

Regulatory Alignment

CampusChain is designed to operate within the regulatory environment that institutional finance teams navigate daily. Below is an honest account of where we are — and where we're headed.

SOC 2 Type II

Planned

SOC 2 Type II audits are the gold standard for SaaS security assurance in enterprise procurement. Our roadmap includes formal engagement with a qualified auditor to evaluate our security, availability, and confidentiality controls.

⚠ SOC 2 Type II audit has not yet been completed. We do not claim SOC 2 compliance.

GLBA Safeguards Rule

In Progress

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Safeguards Rule requires financial institutions — including many universities that offer financial products — to implement an information security program. CampusChain's architecture aligns with core GLBA requirements: access controls, encryption of customer financial information, risk assessment processes, and incident response planning.

Architecture aligned. Policy documentation and formal program documentation in progress.

OFAC Sanctions Screening

Implemented

All stablecoin transactions processed through CampusChain are screened in real-time against the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. Wallet addresses, counterparties, and transaction metadata are checked before settlement. This is a core compliance requirement for any institution handling crypto assets.

✓ Real-time OFAC screening integration is implemented and active.

FERPA Adjacency

In Progress

FERPA protects the privacy of student education records. While CampusChain primarily handles treasury and payment flow data rather than academic records, international tuition payment processing creates adjacency to student financial data. We apply data minimization principles — collecting only what is necessary for payment verification — and enforce role-based access controls so student-linked financial data is never exposed to unauthorized users.

Data minimization and access controls applied. Formal FERPA impact analysis planned.

Data Architecture

How We Protect Your Data

Security is not a layer we added — it is the foundation the platform is built on. Every architectural decision was made with institutional security requirements in mind.

TLS 1.3 In Transit

All connections to and from the platform use TLS 1.3, the most current standard for transport encryption. No unencrypted data channels exist in the architecture.

Hardware-Level Encryption at Rest

Data stored on the Internet Computer is encrypted at the hardware level by the ICP node infrastructure. This is not software-layer encryption — it is enforced by the physical computing substrate.

Immutable Audit Logs

Every financial transaction, compliance event, user action, and system state change is written to an append-only audit log. Records cannot be altered or deleted — only appended.

ICP Data Residency

The Internet Computer's decentralized architecture means no single cloud vendor controls your data. There is no AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud dependency — and no single government subpoena surface.

Regulatory Compliance Matrix

Framework Status

A transparent view of which regulatory frameworks we are aligned with and the current implementation stage for each.

FrameworkStatus
SOC 2 Type II
Financial data security, availability, and confidentiality
Audit roadmap in progress — not yet completed
Planned
GLBA Safeguards Rule
Student financial data protection and institutional controls
Architecture aligned; policy documentation underway
In Progress
OFAC Sanctions Screening
Stablecoin transaction compliance and counterparty checks
Real-time screening integration active
Implemented
FERPA Adjacency
Student record data considerations in institutional context
Data minimization and access controls applied
In Progress
ISO 27001
Information security management system
Post-SOC 2 roadmap item
Planned
NIST CSF
Cybersecurity framework alignment and risk management
Controls mapped to Identify, Protect, Detect functions
In Progress
Sovereign Cloud Architecture

Why ICP Changes the Security Equation

Most enterprise SaaS is built on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. That means your institution's financial data lives on infrastructure controlled by a single commercial entity — subject to their outage risks, their jurisdiction, and their subpoena compliance obligations. CampusChain is different.

No Single Vendor Lock-In

The Internet Computer Protocol runs on a globally distributed network of independent node providers. No single company — including DFINITY — can unilaterally control or shut down the network.

Hardware-Level Encryption

ICP nodes encrypt data at the hardware level using HSMs (Hardware Security Modules). This is not software encryption — the physical substrate enforces it regardless of application-layer configuration.

Canister-Based Data Isolation

Each institution's data is stored in isolated canisters — smart contract containers with deterministic execution. Cross-tenant data access is architecturally impossible, not just policy-controlled.

Geographic Distribution

ICP data is replicated across geographically distributed node providers in multiple jurisdictions. There is no single data center, no single point of failure, and no single government subpoena surface.

What This Means for Your IT Security Team

When your institution's IT security team reviews CampusChain, they will not find an AWS S3 bucket or a GCP Compute instance. They will find a canister deployment on the Internet Computer — a fundamentally different architecture that provides hardware-level security guarantees without relying on a single cloud vendor's security posture. For institutions concerned about vendor dependency risk or jurisdictional data sovereignty, this is a meaningful differentiator.

Need Security Documentation?

Have questions about our security posture or need documentation for your IT security review? We understand institutional procurement requirements. Reach out directly — we will respond within 2 business days.